PURGATORY

PURGATORY IS AN OLD WORD COMING FROM THE EARLY LANGUAGE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, LATIN- I T MEANS TO PURGE , TO CLEAN OR TO
PURIFY-

THIS WORD CAN BE FOUND IN THE LATIN VULGATE THE FIRST BIBLE, ITALIAN AND SPANISH. AND OTHER EUROPEAN BIBLES.


"For no man can lay a foundation other than the one which is laid, which is Jesus Christ," (1 Cor. 3:11).

AND CHRIST LAID THIS FOUNDATION TO THE
TWELVE APOSTLES

THE APOSTLES TO THE BISHOPS

AND THE BISHOPS TO THEIR SUCCEEDING BISHOPS


"AS THE FATHER HAS SENT ME SO I SEND YOU
ANYONE WHO REJECTS YOU REJECTS THE ONE WHO SENT
ME"





REVELATION 21:27- "NOTHING UNCLEAN WILL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE KINGDOM OF GOD"


1 CORINTHIANS 3:10
PAUL IS SAYING ,"I AS A GOOD ARCHITECT, ACCORDING TO THE

CAPACITY GIVEN TO ME , I LAID THE FOUNDATION

AND NO OTHER IS TO BUILD UPON IT-LET EACH ONE BE CAREFUL HOW HE

BUILDS UPON IT.


... PAUL IS SAYING THAT HE FOUNDED CHURCHES IN HIS MISSION TO

THE GENTILES , NOW SIMILARLY HE WILL SAY THAT HE CAN NOT LAY A

FOUNDATION ON ANOTHER MANS TEACHING IN ROME , I WILL DEAL WITH

THAT LATER IN THE BOOK OF ROMANS.


GOD IS A CONSUMING FIRE- DEUTERONOMY 4:24



VERSE 11 "

"NO ONE LAY A FOUNDATION A FOUNDATION OTHER THE ONE WHICH IS

ALREADY LAID, WHICH IS JESUS CHRIST"


PAUL IS NOW SAYING THAT THERE IS ANOTHER KIND OF FOUNDATION ,

THE ONE LAID BY JESUS CHRIST - AND WE HAVE TO BUILD ON THAT

FOUNDATION- ATOP OF THAT FOUNDATION AND NOT LAY ANOTHER

FOUNDATION BUT TO BUILD ON THAT FOUNDATION- WHAT ARE THESE


TO CONTINUE.....

verse 12

" THEN IF SOMEONE BUILDS UPON THIS FOUNDATION, ANOTHER WITH

SILVER, AND PRECIOUS STONES, OR WITH WOOD, BAMBOO OR STRAW.



PAUL IS NOW SAYING WE HAVE TO BUILD UPON THIS FOUNDATION


VERSE 13-

"THE WORK OF EACH ONE WILL BE SHOWN FOR WHAT IT IS. THE DAY OF

JUDGEMENT WILL REVEAL IT REPEAT THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT WILL REVEAL

IT, BECAUSE FIRE WILL MAKE EVERYTHING KNOWN. THE FIRE WILL TEST

THE WORK OF EVERYONE"




PAUL IS NOW SAYING ON OUR JUDGEMENT DAY WHETHER GENERAL OR

PARTICULAR JUDGMENT -PARTICULAR MEANING OUR OWN VERY PERSONAL

ON THE DAY WE MEET OUR MAKER, WE WILL FACE JESUS CHRIST.

AND THERE IS FIRE - WHERE WILL THIS FIRE COME FROM.


GOD IS A CONSUMING FIRE- DEUTERONOMY 4:24



JESUS IS GOD- HE WILL BE OUR JUDGE ON THAT DAY WE MEET OUR MAKER


VERSE 14

"IF YOUR WORK WITHSTANDS THE FIRE YOU WILL BE REWARDED"


PAUL IS NOW SAYING TO EACH ONE OF US THAT OUR WORKS WILL BE LAID

UPON THE FOUNDATION

TO BE BURNED WITH GODS CONSUMING FIRE ON THAT DAY OF OUR

JUDGMENT.OUR DEATH





VERSE 15

"BUT IF YOUR WORK BECOMES ASHES , YOU WILL PAY FOR IT REPEAT YOU

WILL PAY FOR IT

YOU WILL BE SAVED repeat YOU WILL BE SAVED , BUT IT WILL BE AS

IF PASSING THROUGH FIRE"





NOW YOU WILL NOTICE THE VERSES 3:10 TO 15 TALKS ABOUT OUR WORKS

THAT WILL BE LAID ON THAT

FOUNDATION WHICH IS JESUS HIMSELF.


PAUL IS SAYING WHAT THE VALUE OF OUR WORKS OUR LIFE ON THIS EARTH WAS - METHAPHORICALLY ARE

THESE WORTH IN GOLD- THOSE WHO LIVED A VERY HOLY AND SAINTLY LIFE ON EARTH


WORTH IN SILVER -LOWER THAT THE WORKS OF THE SAINTS AND THE

APOSTLES


WORTH IN PRECIOUS STONES- I WOULD LIKE TO EXPLAIN THIS. PRECIOUS

STONES DURING THOSE TIMES WERE NOT MUCH APPRECIATED AS TODAY

BECAUSE THE TECHNOLOGY AT THAT TIME HAS NO MEANS TO

GET THE BEAUTY FROM THIS STONES- THEY COULD NOT CUT AND POLISH

IT LIKE THEY DO TO THE

DIAMONDS OF TODAY. KAYA THIRD RATE NA PRECIOUS LANG ANG MGA ITO-

IT WAS STILL GOLD THAT

WAS THE NUMBER ONE.


HOW ABOUT THOSE WHOSE WORKS OF WOOD BAMBOO AND STRAW- THEY WILL

BURN - MEANING

YOUR WORKS DURING YOUR LIFE ON EARTH WERE NOT SO COMMENDABLE IN

THE SIGHT OF GOD. YOU COMMITED SINS THAT WILL NOT RESULT TO DEATH

YOU WILL BE SAVED ACCORDING TO THE VERSES BUT YOU WILL PAY

AS IF PASSING TO FIRE- YES MY FRIEND THAT IS PURGATORY- CALL IT

ANYWAY YOU WANT - IT IS A PLACE TO PURIFY YOU IN THE SIGHT OF

GOD.



WHY DID DAVID AND NEHEMIAH FASTED MOURNED AND PRAYED FOR THEIR

DEAD?

NEHEMIAH 1:4 NEHEMIAH FASTED PRAYED AND MOURNED FOR THE DEAD ,

1:7 FOR THE SINS OF HIS FAMILY AND HIS FATHER WHO DIED AND WAS BURIED IN THE RUINS
2:3 HIS FATHER IS DEAD AND BURIED


1 SAM 31:13 -DAVID TOOK THE BONES OF SAUL AND SON JONATHAN
2nd SAM 1:4 -SAUL AND SON JONATHAN ARE DEAD

1:11- DAVID FASTED PRAYED AND MOURNED FOR SAUL JONATHAN AND THE DEAD


SO NOW YOU WILL SEE THE JEWS REALLY PRAYED FOR THEIR DEAD

MATT 5:25-26 "YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO PRISON UNTIL THE LAST PENNY IS PAID"

matt 12:32- THERE WILL BE NO FORGIVENESS FOR THOSE WHO BLASPHEMY THE HOLY SPIRIT IN THIS LIFE OR IN THE NEXT TO COME- WHAT IS THIS TO COME??

1 peter 3:18-20 "JESUS IN HIS SPIRIT PREACHED TO THIS SPIRITS IN PRISON"- WHO ARE THEN THESE SPIRITS THAT JESUS PREACHED TO, THEY HAVE BEEN DEAD SINCE THE GREAT FLOOD- CERTAINLY THIS IS NOT HELL- SOULS IN HELL ARE
INCOMMUNICADO- ALL HOPES ARE LOST- AND CONDEMNED FOREVER AND EVER AMEN.

1 JOHN 5:16-17 - SINS THAT WILL NOT RESULT TO THE DEATH OF YOUR SOUL AND THAT IS ETERNAL DAMNATION


PAUL SAYS IN 1 COR 3:15 YOU WILL BE REWARDED- YOU WILL PAY ,AS IF PASSING THROUGH FIRE

AND HOW WILL YOU PAY??

YOU WILL PAY UP TO LAST PENNY-THE GOSPWL SAYS

THE SPIRITS IN PRISON- HAD THEY PAID AND JESUS WILL NOW TAKE THEM OUT OF THAT PRISON FOR THE PROMISE OF HIS
RESURRECTION CAN NOW BE IMPLEMENTED-


THE NEXT AGE TO COME??- IS THIS HEAVEN? CERTAINLY NOT- FOR YOU ARE PAID AND FORGIVEN IN HEAVEN

IS THIS HELL-? you can not pay anymore- you have been damned

WHAT IS THIS PLACE AWAITING FOR YOUR FORGIVENESS- THERE IS ONLY ONE PLACE - AS IF PASSING THROUGH FIRE-
FOR YOU ARE BEING PURIFIED-

REVELATION- NOTHING UNCLEAN CAN ENTER HEAVEN-

THIS PLACE OF PURIFICATION CLEANS YOU UP FOR SINS THAT DOES NOT RESULT TO DEATH-

CALL IT WHAT YOU LIKE- BUT YOU CAN NOT DENY THAT THERE IS SUCH PLACE-

AND IT IS THE MERCY OF GOD FOR A SECOND CHANCE AND NO PLACE TO GO AFTER BUT TO HEAVEN-

Post #2
Elias Arzadon Jr wroteon December 8, 2009 at 9:09am
Purgatory


Intermediate state: Purgatory. No second chances – the souls there are saved, but through fire (1 Corinthians 3:15)


“There is a purgatory, and the souls there detained are assisted by the suffrages of the faithful, but especially by the most acceptable sacrifice of the altar” (Council of Trent).


This dogmatic definition contains 3 points of faith that all Catholics are required to believe:

1. There is a purgatory

2. After death, souls suffer there for their sins

3. The living can extend assistance to such souls


There is a purgatory



Forgiveness of sin in the next – Matthew 12:32

“Under the earth” – Revelations 5:2-3; Philippians 2:10



After death, souls suffer there for their sins

“You will not come out of it till you pay the last penny” – Matthew 5:26

“Matthean Parallel” (See: Matthew 18:23-35)

“Lazarusian Incident” (See: Luke 16:19-31)

Spirits in prison – 1 Peter 3:18-20; 4:6


The living can extend assistance to such souls


Restrain not grace from the dead – Ecclesiasticus (Sirach) 7:37

See: Ruth 1:8

Offerings/Sacrifice for the dead

2 Maccabees 12:38-36

“And making a gathering, he sent twelve thousand drachms of silver to Jerusalem for sacrifice to be offered for the sins of the dead, thinking well and religiously concerning the resurrection” (2 Maccabees 12:43, Douay-Rheims Bible).


Fasting for the for the dead

1 Samuel 31:13;

1 Chronicles 10:12

2 Samuel 1:12


Prayer for the dead

2 Maccabees 12:44-46

“It is therefore a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead, that they may be loosed from sins” (2 Maccabees 12:46, Douay-Rheims Bible).


See: Nehemiah 1:4-6, cf. Nehemiah 2:5


Understanding Purgatory:


1. Understanding the doctrine of purgatory demands knowing the nature/attributes of God:

God is Holy (Habakkuk 1:13; Isaiah 6:3; Revelations 4:8; Leviticus 11:44

God is Just (1 John 1:9; Revelations 15:3)

God is Merciful (Psalm 116, Lamentations 3:22, Psalm 103:8)

See: Ruth 2:20

God is Love (1 John 4:8, 16)


2. Understanding the doctrine of purgatory demands a proper understanding of the concept of sin:


Gradation (degrees) of sin

Mortal Sin vs. Venial Sin (1 John 5:16-17)

WHAT IT MEANS TO HAVE ONE WIFE BE IT A BISHOP OR A DEACON- 1 TIMOTHY chapter 3

WHAT IT MEANS TO HAVE ONE WIFE BE IT A BISHOP OR A DEACON- 1 TIMOTHY chapter 3

Non Catholics just to attack the Catholic Church with their Bishopric and Priests

will not spare the celebacy stand that the Catholic Chruch imposed on the priesthood,

through an ECCLESIASTICAL LAW made by a POPE.

they contend that our BISHOP'S AND PRIEST MUST BE MARRIED according to what the bible said- oh yeah! let us

find out if they understood a very simple verse that only requires a minimum of intelligence -and common sense.


We must put into mind those attacking this gift of GOD to his church do not even
have bishops or priest to talk about-

Billy Graham even commented that God knows who to give this wonderful gift and will receive
it wholeheartedly.

he went further that it drains so much on the coffers of their fellowship providing for
the families of retired Pastors -sending to school their children and providing for the
upkeep of their families.

I remember watching EWTN- THE CONGREGATION OF MOTHER THERESA providing shelter and food
and care to retired , divorced and penniless pastors - what I saw was the old pastor being
hand fed by a sister- he was old and sick- he even apologized for when he was young-he said
too many things against the church that were not even true. Praise God -

"anything you did to the least of my brethren you did it unto me-Matthew 25"

Joel always quotes this- I wonder why? He is not even honest enough to say what fellowship he is
in right now- nor talk about doctrines that they have- he is always in the attack mode saying too many
things and now one by one he is being refuted and still he does not have nor answers any of the questions
that are raised or refutes that we made. I wonder too- if his fellowship does have bishops and priests
what use will you have to raise an issue when you have none of it-

Paul said you cannot give what you do not have-

why compare when you do not have it in you?

So it just boils down to their number one doctrine- as all other Anti-Catholics have as their numero uno
doctrine- validating their existence at the expense of the CATHOLIC CHURCH.

Doctrine number one- "THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THIS AND THE CATHOLIC IS THAT"- THE COMMON DENOMINATOR IN ALL OF THEM.


TIM STAPLES

a convert to Catholiscm and was an avid anti-Catholic and whose only dream in life was to be a BAPTIST PASTOR

with a wife playing the piano by the side in his chapel, told me- "I began to realize that we were all
HIDING behind the shadow of the Catholic Church" - read this in the book "SURPRISED BY THE TRUTH"

To keep us afloat we had to argue and continously argue against the CATHOLIC CHURCH-
Like Islam- all they ever wanted was the world to recognize prophet Mohammed like JESUS CHRIST who has so much

influenced the world.


1 TIMOTHY 3:1-12 "If someone aspires to the overseer's (bishop) ministry, he is without a doubt looking for a

noble task. It is necessary that the overseer be beyond reproach , "THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE"...........
AND A DEACON MUST BE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE"

THIS SIMPLY MEANS THAT IF THEY WERE ORDAINED TO THE POSITION OF BEING A BISHOP OR A DEACON AND THEY ARE
MARRIED. THAT IS THE ONLY WIFE THAT THEY WILL HAVE IN THEIR LIFETIME- IF SHE DIES- THEY CAN NO LONGER RE-MARRY

COMMON SENSE- I AM NOT A BISHOP AND A DEACON- I AM JUST A LAY PRACTICING CATHOLIC. WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS
DOES NOT CONCERN ME- DOES IT MEAN I CAN HAVE MORE THAN ONE TWO THREE FOUR OR MAYBE MORE WIVES IN MY LIFE????

COMPRENDE JOEL???

NOW VERSE 6 "he must not be a recent convert, lest he become conceited........."

IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

A PRIEST CAN NOT MARRY- WHILE A MARRIED MAN CAN BECOME A PRIEST

There are many converts and clergies of various protestant sects who are married and are now priests
in the Catholic Church- one is FR RUTLER- HE IS GOOD AND HIS PHILISOPHY IS SUPERB.

The condition imposed to these converts is that they too cannot re-marry if they are widowed and they
will never be promoted to the position of a bishop.

Now - there are many many convert of the ANGLICAN CHURCH coming into the Catholic Church now and the VATICAN
had to put up a Department to study and accomodate them.

There are many bishops of the ANGLICAN CHURCH WHO ARE COMING IN TOO- millions of their members the news says.

It is for the POPE NOW TO STUDY THE MATTER ON THE BISHOPS OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF ENGLAND.

AFTERALL- HE CAN DO WHATEVER THERE IS TO BIND AND LOOSE- CHRIST GAVE HIS OFFICE THAT AUTHORITY. AMEN

THE BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF JESUS ACCORDING TO NON-CATHOLICS

THE BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF JESUS ACCORDING TO
NON-CATHOLICS- EXCEPT THE EASTERN ORTHODOXY

DID ST. MARY THE MOTHER OF JESUS CHRIST HAVE A LOT OF CHILDREN IN THE FLESH?

There is not a passage in the bible where it says Mary these are your children

nor a passage that says these are the children of Mary- you must remember that

Jesus was the only Son of Mary


Protestant will say that Joseph never had any relations with Mary until she gave birth to Jesus.

if we were to follow this argument and give a conclusion that the protestant says that Joseph had

sexual relations after Jesus was born.


Then Jesus will not be with us after the end of time-

Jesus said in Matthew 26:20 "FOR I am with you always until the end of the world"

So Jesus will not be with us after the end of time or the world . right Harlan and Joel??



The virgin is with a child and bears a son-
Isa 7:14-

"a son"- here means that the virgin will give birth to a baby boy- not a baby girl

Protestants will say - a son means one of the children-

when Jesus was an adult- here is what the Bible said:
Isnt he "THE SON" and not "a son" of but a carpenter from Nazareth?

"This gate shall be kept shut, No one will open it or go through it ,since the GOD OF ISRAEL has been through it"-

the Lord Jesus Christ will pass through it and be born in the flesh. EZ 44:2


If these men named James, Judas, Simon , and Josph were sons of Mary and brothers of Jesus then they are the
natural sons of Joseph, if their fathers was Joseph, the husband of Mary.


But we can read in the bible that there were only two persons names James.

The first James was the brother of St. John the beloved apostle, both are the sons of ZEBEDEE mAT 10:2

and the other James was the brother of Judas; these men were the sons of Alpheus ang the namw Alpheus in GREEK

IS CLEOPHAS -luke 6:15-16


Another proof based on the bible is that these men named Judas and James who are said to be the brothers of Jesus

were from a different father who is Alpheus and not Joseph.


"On entering the city , they went to the room upstairs where they were staying .

Present there were Peter ,John James Andrew ,Philip , Thomas Bartolimew ,Matthew and James son of Alpheus;

Simon the Zealot and judas, son of James" (Acts 1:13).

And as to Joseph it can be seen clearly as to whos was his mother. It was not Mary who was the mother of Jesus.


Mark the evangelist has this to say," there were also some women watching from a distance; among them were

Mary Magdalene, Mary the Mother of James the younger and Joseph and Salome" Mark 15:40


Let us remember that these women were far from the cross where Jesus was nailed.

While they were going nearer the cross , one can see that there stood Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ,at the

foot of the cross, and this other Mary the aunt of Jesus. "Near the cross of Jesus stood His mother, His mother's

sister Mary, who was the wife of CLEOPHAS, and MARY OF MAGDALENE -jOHN 19:25.


AS it is alredy said from the start that this Mary, who is the sister of the mother of Jesus, is the wife

of CLEOPHAS, which is GREEK term for ALPHEUS who is the father of James, Judas and Joseph.

Now it is clear that these men were just cousins of Jesus.not brothers who are of the same mother and father.

The old testament said that the Jews customarily practiced calling brother those of the nearest kin but not

necessarily brother in the FLESH.

ABRAHAM calls LOT who is his nephew, BROTHER. GEN 29:13-15

ST PAUL CALLS ALL HIS NEAREST RELATIVES AS BROTHERS ROM 9:3



The jews do not have a word for cousins , uncle,auntie, or GRANDFATHER-, only FATHER-AB and MOTHER-ACK

their vocabulary was very limited- that is why they adopted the GREEK writing and reading during the

HELLENISTIC PERIOD-GREEK INFLUENCE ON THEM.

Thus it was unavoidable that during the time of Jesus ,a ll cousins and realtives were also called brothers and
sisters.

And even in the masuretic manuscripts-(HEBREW) WE WILL FIND THAT ABSENCE OF VOWELS AND PUNCTUATIONS.


LUKE NOT A JEW WHO WROTE TO THE GENTILES- had to be specific- HE CALLED THE BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF JESUS

AS HIS "RELATIVES"- but on the subsequent verse we will find because this was in JERUSALEM- A JEW REPLIED

as LUKE quoted him in his gospel- "HERE ARE YOUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS"- which LUKE earlier describes as

"HIS RELATIVES"

WHILE MATTHEW A JEW WROTE IN HIS GOSPEL "the brothers and sisters of JESUS "

bOTH WERE WRITIN ON THAT SIMILAR INCIDENT IN THEIR GOSPELS


Another strong indication that Jesus had not brother in the flesh is that while Jesus was dying on the cross,

he commended his mother to St. John , the youngest apostle, And from that day on John took Mary into his own home

John 19:27, if JESUS had a younger brother why is that Jesus did not turn his Mother over to him and let them go
home because during that time Joseph his foster father was already dead. It was also customary to the Jews by Law

that the second child must take care of his widowed father or mother.


Instead he he left his mother to the care of John the apostle that he loved indicating that Jesus had no brother

nor a sister.

This is a blasphemous attack on the BLESSED VIRGIN MARY TO SAY THAT SHE HAD MANY CHILDREN IN THE FLESH

THUS SAYS THE BIBLE-

Viva Santo Nino!

    Infant Jesus of Prague

 

Santo Nino De Tondo Parish

Maligayang Kapistahan Mahal na Poong Santo Nino! 

Photo Credit: Katoliko Ako

To Our Non-Filipino Readers

To all non-Filipino readers, there are some parts in our posts that are written in Tagalog (Filipino dialect). If you want those portions translated in English just post a comment  or send us a message so we can translate them in English. 

Thank you for understanding.

In Christ,

The blog moderators

Peter In Rome

 

Source: National Geographic Magazine

JESUS IS NOT A TRUE MAN BY ELI SORIANO AS TOLD BY MICHAEL RYAN DELA CRUZ

TEEWEE WRITES


JOCELYN -

PALAGAY KO KAYO NA ANG MAGUSAP DITO NI MICHEAL RYAN

ISANG ADD NA AVID FAN NI SORIANO- GRADUATE NG SORIANO UNIVERSITY SA APALIT

ISANG BAGONG THEOLEGIAN - GENETIC SCIENTIST AT ABOGADO PA-

A PRACTIONER OF SORIANOLOGY

"WHAT IS SAID TODAY IS DIFFERENT FROM YESTERDAY AND WILL BE DIFFERENT AGAIN TOMORROW"


TANDAAN NYO YAN- ALTHOUGH ANG KAUNA UNAHANG DOCTRINA NI SORIANO TO VALIDATE HIS CLAIM

AS AN ORGANIZATION ASIDE FROM THE ONE WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE AND COMMISSION BEING A

REGISTERED CULT WHOSE NATURE OF BUSINESS IS TO PROPAGATE THE GOOD NEWS OF JESUS CHRIST IS THIS:


"THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THIS AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THAT" ANG MGA PARI AY BOBO AT LAHAT NG GINAGAWA NG

KATOLIKO AY MALI- PERO WALANG MAPATUNAYAN IF CONFRONTED - MAG TATAGO- MAG HAHAMON AT MAG TATAGO DIN PALA

KASI NGA WALA SIYANG DOCTRINANG NAKASULAT- HINDI KASI MARUNONG MAGSULAT AT HINDI MAGSUSULAT PARA MABAGO

NANAMAN NIYA- AT SISIGAW NG HINDI YAN! HINDI YAN! NG MAIPIT SIYA NG INC SA NAPAKA WALANG KA KWENTA KWENTANG

PAKSA- ANG BESO BESO. SA YABANG KASI NITO AT SA DAMI NG PALIWANAG SA BESO BESO- HINDI TULOY NIYA MALAMAN KUNG

ANO ANG ISASAGOT NIYA.


LAHAT GALING SA BIBIG NIYA NA NAG CHA CHA CHA MAGALAW - MEANING

PABAGO BAGO , STEP TO THE LEFT AND STEP TO THE RIGHT ,ATRAS ABANTE . BULTO BULTO ITONG MGA KONTRAHANG MGA ITO - AT

ITO AY MGA NASA CD BINABASAG PARA HINDI SIYA MAQUOTE MULA NG TINIKTIKAN SIYA NG INC


AT INATAKE SA KANILANG PROGRAMA SA NET 25. AT ANG PALUSOT NIYA- AY ILAGAY NA LANG SA CD PARA BABASAGIN

NA LANG - GIVING HIM THE LICENSE TO SAY WHATEVER HE WANTS WHICH IS NOW VERY EVIDENT IN WHAT THIS MICHAEL

IS SAYING




NOW LET US LOOK AT THE REASONING OF THIS NEW GENETIC SCIENTIST, LAWYER, OB GYNE DAHIL SA

MAY ALAM PA ITO SA REPRODUCTIVE CAPABILITY NG TAO AND ALSO A COMEDIAN ESTE THEOLEGIAN DAW

BY THE NAME OF MICHAEL RYAN


ANG ARGUMENT NI MICHAEL

Jocelyn my answer is for you. Correction po, Jesus Christ did not took the flesh and blood of Mary. Yes His human


body was born out of Mary but the body was not from Mary. Read what the Angel Gabriel said in Luke 1:34-35. The


body of the Lord Jesus Christ is not because of Mary but because of the power of the Holy Spirit sent to her from


God.Malinaw pong nasa talata na sinabi ni Gabriel, " ang banal na bagay na ipanganganak ay tatawaging Anak ng


Dios." Yun pong banal na bagay na tinutukoy ay yun pong NASA katawan na ipanganganak at hindi po yung katawang


ipanganganak. Ang nasa katawan po ay ang Cristo na Anak ng Dios. I personally believe po na hindi ito dahil sa DNA


ni Mary dahil naturally, kailangan pong may "makilala biblically o magsama" ang isang babae at lalake para magka-


anak at magtaglay ng DNA nila. Si Mary po mismo ang nagsabi na kailanman, wala po syang nakilalang lalaki. We have


to remember po na the Holy Spirit can also create because He came from God. And since the body of the Lord Jesus


Christ came to be not because of DNA but because of the power of the Holy Spirit according to the Bible, lalo po


nitong pinatitibay ang aking pananampalataya na ang Panginoong Jesucristo po ay HINDI tunay na tao. SYA PO AY DIOS


NA NAGKATAWANG TAO. Salamat po Jocelyn sa comment mo.

---------

TEEWEE'S COMENT

ON THE ABOVE STATEMENT OF THIS GENETIC SCIENTIST MICHAEL



UNANG UNA MICHAEL ANG TAMANG INGLIS AY "JESUS CHRIST DID NOT TAKE hindi did not "took"- dahil past tense na ang


verb na "DID" NA GINAMIT MO- magaral ka muna ng tamang English- sa isang GRAMMATICIAN sabi ni SORIANO

BALIKWAS KA NANAMAN SA SINABI MO- "YES HE IS HUMAN" - O HUMAN NAMAN PALA- SA previous statement mo sabi mo hindi-

dahil ba baka banatan ka ni JOCELYN isang ADD DIN-



STATEMENT NI MICHAEL

"but the body was not from MARY" - AH KUNG GANUN- kanino nanggaling ang katawan mo? saan ka nanggaling ha MICHAEL-
putok ka ba sa buho- your BODY IS NOT FROM YOUR MOTHERS WOMB? -


TEEWEE COMMENT

ang holy spirit ba buong katawan ang inilagay nito sa sinapupunan ni MARIA? - AT GINAWA LANG NA INCUBATION WOMB
ANG KAY MARY?-

WALA NAMANG SINABI SA GOSPEL NA MAY DALANG KATAWAN ANG ANGEL- PARA IPA INCUBATE SA WOMB NI MARY - MERON BA

gaano ka tagal MICHAEL? PARANG MANOK ANO?

tapos born of MARY? - ANONG SAGOT ITO? nagmana ka na kay eli kinontra mo na ang sinabi mo agad.


ANOTHER DISASTROUS STATEMENT OF MICHAEL

Read what the Angel Gabriel said in Luke 1:34-35. The body of the Lord Jesus Christ is not because of Mary but

because of the power of the Holy Spirit sent to her from God.Malinaw pong nasa talata na sinabi ni Gabriel, " ang

banal na bagay na ipanganganak ay tatawaging Anak ng Dios." Yun pong banal na bagay na tinutukoy ay yun pong NASA

katawan na ipanganganak at hindi po yung katawang ipanganganak.



COMMENT NI TEEWEE

NGAYON HINDI NA TAO O DIYOS ANG ITINAWAG NI MICHAEL KAY BABY JESUS NA NASA TIYAN NI MARIA-

ITO AY ISA NG BAGAY NGAYON- JUST A THING- NAPAKABASTOS TALAGA NITO-

ANG ISANG BAGAY TAKE NOTE ISANG BANAL NA BAGAY AY TATAWAGING DIYOS- ANG DIYOS AY BAGAY NA LANG PALA - HINDI AKO

MATIGIL SA KATATAWA SA COMEDIAN NA ITO JUST LIKE HIS TEACHER.

IT TAKES THE MIND OF AN IDIOT to UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IDIOT IS SAYING BECAUSE I CAN NOT REALLY DECIPHER WHAT THIS IDIOT IS SAYING.

CAN YOU?


MICHAEL THE COMEDIAN AN ADD WRITES

" Yun pong banal na bagay na tinutukoy ay yun pong NASA katawan na ipanganganak at hindi po yung katawang

ipanganganak."


TEEWEE COMMENT

SO SA PALIWANAG NITO NI MICHEAL AY MAY BANAL NA BAGAY PALA NA KASAKASAMA ANG KATAWAN NI JESUS SA SINAPUPUNAN NI

MARIA?

NA HINDI NAMAN NIYA MAIPALIWANAG KUNG ANO ITO KASI TINAWAG LANG NA DIYOS- ANOTHER MALABO NANAMAN ITO

SO NANGANGAHULUGAN ANG KATAWN NI JESUS AY HINDI BANAL- ANG HINDI BANAL AT BANAL AY NGAYON NAGSAMA NA-
SO PWEDE NGAYON GUMAWA ANG KATAWAN NG MASAMA DAHIL HINDI ITO BANAL-

GUMAWA PALA ANG DIYOS NG KATAWAN NA HINDI TEMPLE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ANO? AT KATAWAN PA NA GINAMIT NI JESUS
AT HINDI ITO BANAL- KAY JESUS PA ANG HINDI BANAL- YUNG BAGAY LANG DAW- NA HINDI MAIPALIWANAG

ANG BANAL NA BAGAY SA KATAWAN NI JESUS AY MAY SARILING PAGIISIP SA KATAWAN NIYA NA HINDI BANAL- AT PWEDE ITONG

HUMIWALAY SA KANYA KAHIT NA KELAN- AT ANO NAMAN ANG KALALABASAN NG KATAWAN NI JESUS PAG ITO HUMIWALAY-
SINO KAYA ITONG KATAWAN NA ITO- ANO BA ANG TUNAY NA PAGKATAO NITO? baka si ZOMBIE? katawan lang kasi NA HINDI BANAL walang kaluluwa, MABUBUHAY BA ITO PAG INIWANAN NG BANAL NA BAGAY-

ANO NAMAN ANG PAGKATAO NITONG KALALABASAN NITO PAG NAWALA ANG BANAL NA BAGAY NA SINASABI NI MICHAEL-
ITO BA AY TATAYO AT MAKAKAUSAP DIN O MAG COCOLAPSE NA LANG PAG NAWALA ANG BANAL NA BAGAY- ANO NAMAN
ANG SASABIHIN NIYA ANG PANAGALAN NIYA- KASI YUNG TATAWAGIN JESUS NA DIYOS AY PWEDIN HUMIWALAY SA KATAWAN NA ITO

HINDI NAMAN ITO NAGSALITA SA GOSPEL AT NAGPAKILALA KUNG SINO SIYA- KILALANG KILALA yata NI ELI SORIANO ITO-


YOU GO YOUR WAY ANG I GO MY WAY PAG SIGURO NAGUUSAP ANG BANAL NA BAGAY SA KATAWANG ISINOUT NIYA. GANON ANG GUSTONG

IPALABAS NI SORIANO- PARANG KOTSENG SINAKYAN LANG.

O KAYA ISANG KATAWAN NA MAY ZIPPER AT ISINOOT LANG NG BANAL NA BAGAY NA TINAWAG NA DIYOS!!!

KAYA ANG LAHAT NG SINABI NI JESUS SA GOSPEL AY GALING SA BANAL NA BAGAY AYON KAY MICHAEL

EH ANO NAMAN ANG IPINAKO MICHAEL? ANG KATAWAN LANG PALA-

ANG BANAL NA BAGAY AY NAKILITI LANG ITO DAHIL HINDI ITO NAKARANAS NG LUPIT NA GINAWA SA KATAWAN-NA TINAWAG NA

KATAWANG ISINOUT LANG NI JESUS-

NAPAKALUPIT PALA NG DIYOS- GUMAWA NG ISANG ZOMBIE NA KATAWAN PARA PAGLARUAN AT BIGYAN LAHAT NG KAHIRAPAN BEYOND A
HUMAN MIND CAN IMAGINE TAPOS DRAMA LANG PALA- WALANG PERSONALIDAD- DAHIL KATAWAN LANG ITO

HINDI DIN PALA NABAYARAN ANG PAGKAKAUTANG NG SANGKATAUHAN SA KANYA DAHIL PEKE PALA ANG PINAMBAYAD NIYA.

TUMATANGGAP PALA ANG DIYOS NG PEKENG KABAYARAN.

HINDI PALA NATUTUBOS ANG SANGKATAUHAN KUNG GANON-

EH MICHAEL BAKIT NUNG UMAKYAT SI JESUS SA LANGIT- HINDI NIYA IPINARK ANG KOTSENG GINAMIT NIYA O KATAWANG ISINOOT

NIYA HINDI NIYA HINANGER MUNA -

BAKIT ISINAMA NIYA ANG KATAWAN NIYA SA LANGIT?

TANDAAN MO NOTHING UNCLEAN CAN ENTER HEAVEN- AT HINDI BANAL ANG KATAWAN NI JESUS- SO NO ENTRY TO HEAVEN-

EH UMAKYAT ANG KATAWAN EH- HINDI INIWANAN

BAKA NAMAN NAGPA CARWASH NA YUNG KOTSE - O NALIGO NG HUSTO ANG KATAWAN NA GINAMIT NI JESUS

ANO KAYA SA TINGIN NINYO?

MGA KAIBIGAN- KAYO NA LANG PO ANG MAGBIGAY NG MGA KATANUNGAN NINYO DAHIL HINDI AKO MATIGIL SA KATATAWA SA SINABI
NG TAONG SI MICHAEL NA ITO

SI MARIA NAMAN AY ISANG DELIVERY VAN LANG - NG MAIDELIVER ANG BANAL BAGAY AT NA PANGANAK ANG KATAWAN AY TAPOS NA ANG PAPEL NIYA

GANUN PO LALABAS ANO

GANYAN BA ANG PAGIISIP NG MGA KASAPI SA INYO JOCELYN??

IKAW JOCELYN HINDI BA BANAL ANG KATAWAN MO?- A TEMPLE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT- IKAW NA ANG TINANONG KO PARA MAKAKUHA
AKO NG MATINONG SAGOT. BAKA MAHAWA AKO KAY MICHEAL EH. BUTI PA ANG MGA KATAWAN NATIN TEMPLE OF THE HLY SPIRIT
AT BANAL- KAY JESUS HINDI ITO BANAL, YUNG BAGAY LANG AT ITANONG MO KAY MICHAEL ANO IYON.


ANOTHER DISASTROUS STATEMENT THIS TIME COMING FROM THE GENETIC SCIENTIST MICHAEL RYAN THE COMEDIAN

I personally believe po na hindi ito dahil sa DNA ni Mary dahil naturally, kailangan pong may "makilala

biblically o magsama" ang isang babae at lalake para magka-anak at magtaglay ng DNA nila. Si Mary po mismo ang

nagsabi na kailanman, wala po syang nakilalang lalaki. We have to remember po na the Holy Spirit can also create

because He came from God. And since the body of the Lord Jesus Christ came to be not because of DNA but because of

the power of the Holy Spirit according to the Bible, lalo po nitong pinatitibay ang aking pananampalataya na ang

Panginoong Jesucristo po ay HINDI tunay na tao. SYA PO AY DIOS NA NAGKATAWANG TAO. Salamat po Jocelyn sa comment

mo.



TEEWEES COMMENT ON THE STATEMENT OF THIS COMEDIAN GENETIC SCIENTIST WHICH IS MICHAEL


STATEMENT NI MICHEAL NA ISANG GENETIC SCIENTIST NAMAN DAW

" I personally believe po na hindi ito dahil sa DNA ni Mary dahil naturally, kailangan pong may "makilala

biblically o magsama" ang isang babae at lalake para magka-anak at magtaglay ng DNA nila. Si Mary po mismo ang

nagsabi na kailanman, wala po syang nakilalang lalaki."



TEEWEE'S REPLY

"KAILANGANG DAW MAY MAKASAMA ANG ISANG BABAE BIBLICALLY-"

michael-

kaya nga ibinigay ni JESUS SI JOSEPH - KAY MARIA AT IPINASABI SA ANGEL NA IPINADALA NIYA

PARA SAMAHAN NIYA SI MARIA- BECAUSE UNMARRIED WOMEN UNDER THE MOSAIC LAW THAT ARE IMPREGNATED

AND CONCEIVES A CHILD WILL BE STONED TO DEATH ADULTERY ANG KASALANAN MO. AND JOSEPH WHO WAS A RIGHTEOUS MAN KNOWS THIS - AND EVEN THOUGH HE KNOWS THAT IT WAS NOT HIS CHILD THAT MARY WAS CARRYING HE DECIDED TO TAKE MARY AS HIS WIFE. - BECAUSE OF THE HARSH MOSAIC LAW.



ANG DNA AY ANG SIYANG NAGBIBIGAY NG STRUCTURA NG ISANG FETUS NASA SA SINAPUPUNAN NA DINADALA NG ISANG NANAY

KUNG ANO ANG MAGIGING ANYO NITO AT AT ANG MGA CHARACTERISTICS NG IKALALABAS NG BATA AT SA PAGLAKI NITO AYON SA

PINAGTUBUAN NITONG SINAPUPUNAN-

ANG HINDI LANG NAIBIBIGAY NG DNA AY AY MAGIGING GENDER NITO-

DIYOS NA ANG TANUNGIN MO KUNG BAKIT BABAE O LALAKI ANG LALABAS NA FETUS. ITANONG MO NA DIN KAY SORIANO KUNG

BAKIT LALAKI O BABAE ANG LALABAS- AT ITANONG MO NA DIN KUNG BAKIT MAY MGA BAKLANG LUMALABAS O TOMBOY KAYA.

ALAM MO NAMAN YAN- HE KNOWS EVERYTHING WRONG EH.


KAYA IBIGAY MO SA AKIN ANG TALATANG ISANG FETUS NA GINAWA NG HOLY SPIRIT AT YUN ANG IPINUNLA NG ANGEL
SA TIYAN NI MARIA PARA HINDI ITO MAGTAGLAY NG DNA NI MARIA- ANTAYIN KO ANG TALATA MO GAGO



WALANG IMPOSSIBLE SA DIYOS NA KILALA KO KAY MAY BABAE O LALAKI PARA SA PROCREATION NG SANKATUHAN MAGAGAWA NIYA

KAHIT NA NGA WALANG BABAE O LALAKE MAKAKAGAWA SIYA NG TAO- SA PAMAMGITAN NG LUPA GUMAWA SIYA NG TAO-

KAHIT NA NGA WALANG LUPA MAKAKAGAWA SIYA NG TAO.

DOON NALAMAN NI MARIA NA KAHIT NA WALANG LALAKE AY MAKAPAGBUBUNTIS SIYA- AT KAHIT NA DELIKADO ANG MAGBUNTIS SIYA

DAHIL SA BATAS- HINDI NAG ALINLANGAN SI MARIA AT SUMANGAYON SIYA AGAD SA IBINALITA NG ANGEL- DAHIL SA LAKI NG

PANANAMPALATAYA NIYA AT PUNONG PUNO SIYA NG GRASYA NG DIYOS- AT HINDI SIYA NATATAKOT GAYA NI SORIANO

KAYA "OO" AGAD ANG SINAGOT NIYA NA WALANG ALINLANGAN.


IF GOD IS WITH MARY YOU WHO CAN BE AGAINST HER-



ANOTHER DISASTROUS STATEMENT OF MICHAEL THE GENETIC SCIENTIST


"We have to remember po na the Holy Spirit can also create

because He came from God. And since the body of the Lord Jesus Christ came to be not because of DNA but because of

the power of the Holy Spirit according to the Bible, lalo po nitong pinatitibay ang aking pananampalataya na ang

Panginoong Jesucristo po ay HINDI tunay na tao. SYA PO AY DIOS NA NAGKATAWANG TAO. Salamat po Jocelyn sa comment

mo."


TEEWEE REPLY

BEFORE JESUS WENT TO HEAVEN- HE SAID THE PARACLETE OR THE HOLY SPIRIT - THE GUIDE TO THE TRUTH AND THE GIVER OF
LIFE-

SA GENESIS PA LANG MABABASA NA ITO- GOD BREATHED THE HOLY SPIRIT INTO THE NOSTRILS OF ADAM THAT HE CREATED FROM DUST AND IMMEDIATELY IT CAME TO LIFE.

SO EVERY HUMAN BEING THAT HAS LIFE CAME FROM GOD BECAUSE IT IS THE HOLY SPIRIT THAT GIVES LIFE STARTING FROM
ADAM WHICH WAS BREATHED TO HIS NOSTRILS- THE HOLY SPIRIT THE GIVER OF LIFE SABI NI JESUS HEHEH


IT IS NOT THE DNA THAT GIVES LIFE BUT THE SOUL THAT IS GIVEN BY THE HOLY SPIRIT THE GIVER OF LIFE-
ONCE A BODY DIES THE SOUL LEAVES THE BODY AND RETURNS TO GOD TO BE JUDGED- IT IS UP TO GOD TO RETURN
THAT SOUL THAT WILL MAKE THE BODY LIVE AGAIN-

NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE WITH GOD-

HE CAN MAKE HIMSELF HUMAN EVEN WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A HUMAN PARENT OR BEING CONCEIVED IN THE WOMB-

SINCE WALANG AMA SI JESUS NA KAHATI SA KATAWAN NIYA MEANING NO CONTRIBUTION FROM A HUMAN FATHER

JESUS WAS CONCEIVED IN THE HUMAN BODY OF MARY - SO THEREFOR ALL THE DNA OF JESUS IN HIS FLESH

CAME FROM MARY- AND DNA IS THE PROGRAM OF A HUMAN BODY THAT WILL GUIDE THE HUMAN BODY AS TO SHAPE AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMAN DONOR HIS PARENTS AS IT DEVELOPES IN THE WOMB AND OUTSIDE THE BODY AS IT GROWS INTO
ADULTHOOD

TAKING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HUMAN DONOR OR ITS PARENT WHICH WILL BE EVIDENT IN THE PROCREATED

BODY THAT WAS CONCEIVED IN HER WOMB.

HINDI NAMAN PO SINAKSAK ANG FETUS NI JESUS NG ANGEL KAY MARIA ANG FETUS NA GALING SA LANGIT NA GUSTONG

PALABASIN NI MICHAEL SA ARGUMENTO NIYA- BAKIT DADAAN PA SA PAGKA BABY SI JESUS- BAKIT HINDI NA LANG

ISANG ADULT AGAD- HINDI BA MAGAGAWA ITO NG DIYOS- NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE WITH HIM


AS DEMONSTRATED BY ELIJAH WHO PRAYED TO GOD FOR THE RETURN OF THE SOUL OF THE DEAD BOY- I KINGS 17:21-22

ITONG ATING GENETIC SCIENTIST CUM COMEDIAN NA SI MICHAEL AY MALI MALI NANAMAN KASI ANG AMO NIYA AY

PARATING MALI

HINDI DIN MAIPALIWANAG NI GENIUS MICHAEL ANG BANAL NA BAGAY NA IBINIGAY NG ESPIRITU SANTO AT ITO AY TINAWAG

NA DIYOS

KUNG HINDI TUNAY NA TAO DIN SI JESUS SIYA AY TAU TAUHAN LANG PALA-

SA INC SI JESUS AY HINDI TUNAY NA DIYOS- AT KAY ELI NAMAN NA NAKIKITA SA PANGANGATWIRAN NI MICHAEL

SI JESUS AY HINDI TUNAY NA TAO- ANO NAMAN KAYA ITONG HINDI TUNAY NA TAO?

PLASTIC BA ITO O SYNTHETIC O ZOMBIE O ISANG MUTANT-

GAYA NG SINABI NI FIX ME- NAGUGUTOM - UMIYAK- NALUNGKOT- DINUGO - AT NAMATAY- AT NAGAGALAK

ALL THE ATTRIBUTES OF A HUMAN BEING- AT NAPAPATAY DIN ANG KATAWAN NIYA-

TSK TSK-

HINDI TUNAY NA TAO SA ADD - SA INC HINDI TUNAY NA DIYOS-

EH NAGKITA SILA SA GITNA- PAREHO PALA ANG PANIWALA NILA- BAKLA AND PANIWALA NILA-

SO THERE IS SOMETHING IN COMMON WITH THE TWO HINDI NILA ALAM AT NAG AAWAY PA SILA-

MEDYO MEDYO -

ANG DIYOS NAGBIGAY NG PEKENG TAO NA SI JESUS KASI HINDI TUNAY SABI NI SORIANO AT NI MICHAEL

ANG HILIG NINYO SA PEKE- GALING SA PEKENG MANGANGARAL

NGAYON JOCELYN SANGAYON KA BA SA PALIWANAG NG KASAMA MO O HINDI-

NGAYON KUNG SANG AYON KA -

IKAW KAYA ANG MAGPALIWANAG KASI HINDI NAMIN MAINTINDIHAN AT WALANG KA LOHICA LOHICA ANG SINABI NITONG

MICHAEL NA ITO

SUBUKAN MO NAMAN KAYANG IPALIWANAG ANG HINDI TUNAY NA PAGKATAO NI JESUS BAKA KAYA MO -

PARANG SECOND OPINION KA NAMAN OKAY

MERON SUSUNOD PA

MICHAEL PASISIKATIN KITA SA BUONG MUNDO DAHIL SA KATWIRANG MONG YAN SA BLOG

PAG HINDI KA ININTINDI - EH SORI NA LANG ME DIPERENSIYA KA NA SIGURO

COZ THEY DID NOT TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY OR YOU ARE A BIG JOKE